Big Sis Caught Lying On TSA Being Safe
Big Sis Caught Lying On TSA Being Safe – Although United States Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano or “Big Sister” claims that the new full body scans being implemented by the TSA are safe, there are some who aren’t so sure.
John Tyner was one of the most recent people to refuse the new security measure which is appearing in an increasing number of airports all across the country. He said that after reading the safety manual of these machines, he declined going through. This can become a problem for many who decided to opt out, but they do have an alternative.
The alternative to the full body scam is a thorough and somewhat invasive pat down which involves feeling the groin area. Napolitano has said that the safety of the full body scan been confirmed by multiple sources, including Johns Hopkins University and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Despite the reassurance from Homeland Security, there are still quite a few people who are up in arms about the new measures which are being pushed on random people at the airport as they go through security. Recently there has been a number of those who have refused either the full body scan or a pat down, earning them attention from police and TSA agents.
Category: News
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
Please be smart and check what is written and confirm the facts, check if what John’s Hopkins really says that the x-rays are ok. Even if they are really safe, what about are rights? Remember what Benjamin Franklin said “Any one who will trade freedom for security deserves neither security or freedom”. Wake up america and stand up for your children and say NO to searching your child!!!
when that terrorist takes out the plane with your family on it, you might we re-evaluate the value of ‘freedom’ and you might reconsider the vaue of your rights, over security. I have no doubt that the terrorists would happily secret explosive in a childs groin area if they figured it would breach security.
@Barryq
I’m much more afraid of our government infringing – in the n name of protecting me – upon my rights and freedoms than of losing my life or the lives of those I love to some terrorists.
And if you don’t understand why we were attacked – let me quote the interview of General Stanley McChrystal: “It’s “insurgent math,” as he calls it – for every innocent person you kill, you create 10 new enemies.” …http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236?RS_show_page=3
I can sort of understand people who fear freedom, who want someone to protect them from the scary chaos of an unregulated environment.
One thing we Americans are good at – we obey.
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
It’s not a right to fly on a plane. It’s a privilege. It’s not free we do have to pay for it after all. Patting me down so they know that I don’t have a bomb doesn’t infringe on my rights. If it infringes on yours remember there are other means of transportation available.