Comments on: Are Michael Jackson’s Kids Biologically His?

By: Tim5365

Tim5365 — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:47:21 +0000

A DNA test … definately! But probably not neccessary. The kids need to live in peace.

By: Tim5365

Tim5365 — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:45:13 +0000

Bottom line is … if you can take a photo of michael (before all the surgeries, and compare it to pics of the kids, and you can see the true Jackson features (especially the nose) and there are similarities … their more than likely MJs!!

By: Beverly

Beverly — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:53:04 +0000

Who knows if they are white or bi racial? Michael is in the real sense their Dad. Having said that. If he is not biological Dad he should have made that clear and told them from the beginning. He would still be a wonderful adoptive Dad. However, he is dead and now are they to grow up not knowing if they are white or bi racial? Not knowing if he is their biological father? If he is not then I feel it is wrong. They have a right to know. If he was their adopdive dad they would still love him and have wonderful memories. I just hope for their sake they know if he is biologicaly their dad.

By: Daryl-cueball

Daryl-cueball — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:09:54 +0000

In response to Gilbert Grate I say he is the smartes of you all!! I personally didn’t read the article in US Magazine, yet came to the same conclusion that, only Blanket is biologicaly his own, the 2 oldest are from another , I guess he wanted to pass on his gene to at least one child, Blanket looks nothing like the other 2.! And when Prince was a baby he had Platinum Blonde hair!! And Bue eyes! And so for the girl. Only Blanket is Michaels.

By: Marsha

Marsha — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:44:54 +0000

I can’t believe anyone could think any of these three kids are 100% white. If you see pictures of them next to a black person, they look white, but beside a white person, they have an obviously olive skin tone. I don’t know that they are MJ’s, but if not, the sperm donor was hispanic or black one or the other. Blanket, I really believe is MJ’s. He looks a lot like MJ as a child, just a shade lighter. He is the same shade as the average biracial child. The older two could be MJ’s as well. MJ’s dad is obviously mixed with something and has blue eyes. Genes can be passed down and not show up in the child, but be passed on to the grandchild. My son is biracial. His father is darker than MJ ever was; the whole family is Michael Jordan’s complexion. I am white with blond hair and blue eyes. Our son is Paris’ complexion with blue eyes, although he does have curlier hair. I thought it was unusual and couldn’t happen again, but when my ex remarried and had another child, she was even paler than my son with strawberry blond hair and blue eyes. Recessive genes can be really strong, especially when the white partner is of the blond/blue type.

By: April

April — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:59:24 +0000

@Max Shut up, please—you sound borderline retarded. Get your head out the clouds…

By: April

April — Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:53:52 +0000

Sorry, I know we’d all like to believe that Michael’s sperm had something to do with these children being born—but biologically, there is NO WAY he fathered these children. Come on people, we all know what biracial children look like—there are certain features and characteristics that are just associated with different races (i.e. Asian slanted/uncreased eyes). And while it is very possible that the maternal genes were dominant in this case, I highly doubt all three would come out looking NOTHING like Michael, or any member of his family! There is no indication of African American genes in those kids whatsoever. I’m not saying that the kids should look like Alicia Keys, Hally Berry or Lenny Kravitz (all biracial)—but it’s PURE biology and Paris & Prince are clearly of Caucausian decent. And although Blanket has a bit tanner skin, I’m still convinced that he may be of Caucasian (German) and something along the lines of Latin decent. If you ask any geneticist, DNA isn’t the only clear indication of a person’s ethnic background. Yes, Debbie Rowe is white—but Michael was a 100% kinky haired, full nosed, dark-skinned black man (before all the surgery). And some of these genes should have passed on somewhere along the line to at least ONE of the kids. Is it purely coincidental that all three come out without any type of African American features—no curly hair, no melanine in the skin, no full features??? I think not.

There’s no doubt that he’s their father, in an adoptive sense and I’m sure he’s been a great dad to them. He’s had them all since birth! But the survey says NO to the inkling that his sperm created them. Of course, no one will ever officially confirm this for the sake of the kids. I suppose it doesn’t matter now anyway. I just hope the fact that he didn’t father these children biologically had nothing to do with his obvious self-hatred. It’d be a shame to be such an icon and had never left behind a child of your own, all because you dislike the way you look…

By: Deja

Deja — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:32:41 +0000

Only a moron would believe those are his biological kids. It’s rediculous to compare his plastic surgery to the features of these children… Are you people smoking?!

By: jt

jt — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:17:12 +0000

Yes a great man king of pop…that liked kids a little too much!! Sorry have to be blind to think He was not a little to niice to young cute boys….

By: Sierra

Sierra — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:43:50 +0000

I’m just gonna jump in here really quick and say, In my honest opinion, I do think that Michael’s children are his biological children. Debbie was white and that’s a good explanation for their skin color. They definitely have Michael’s facial features, too. Though, whether or not they are his biological kids doesn’t matter. He loved them, they loved him. He was their father by heart if nothing else. I think it’s time we let Mchael rest, don’t you think he went through enough already? And Prince, Paris and Blanket are already in for a life of questioning and confusion directed at them… we should just let it go, and take the family’s word for it, because Michael doesn’t deserve this, and neither do his children!